Page 5 - :: Publications
P. 5

Perhaps a country like South Sudan should count itself lucky   she was filming “sensitive locations” which were, nevertheless,
        and grateful to have famous, rich and influential friends like   not identified by any “PHOTOGRAPHY PROHIBITED”
        George  Clooney  &  Friends  who  could  afford  to  hire  the   sign. And they would not return the camera to her in spite of
        Satellite Sentinel to spy on Khartoum’s military movements   pleadings (pleadings!) from supposedly powerful individuals
        along our common border? - Sentinel is, by the way, reported   from both the ministries of Information and Interior/Home
        to have been the first to spot the smoke rising from bombed   Affairs!
        Yarmouk.                                               So what is going on? Reporters or visitors are human beings

        When visitors or reporters have been forced to adopt   and  will  report  their  experiences.  If  permits  issued  by  our
        such  a  negative  attitude  towards  us  because  of  our   government are ignored by our security officers or laughed
                                                               at  by  “criminals  in  uniform”,  as  President  Kiir  has  long
        behaviour towards them, they begin to see or report    acknowledged;  if  our  security  personnel  fail  or  refuse  to
        negative  activities  that  would  have  been  otherwise   identify  areas  of  “no  photography”,  thus  leaving  the  door
        ignored  or  excused  had  our  attitude  been  positive   open for criminals - in uniform or otherwise - to choose at
        towards them.                                          will what can be photographed and what not, we as a nation
                                                               must be prepared for negative reporting of our country.
        However, the real reasons for sensitivity against photography   When visitors or reporters have been forced to adopt such
        at Juba Airport may have nothing to do with national security,   a  negative  attitude  towards  us  because  of  our  behaviour
        but  more  to  do  with  attempts  to  hide  from  publicity  the   towards them, they begin to see or report negative activities,
        dilapidated, dirty and chaotic state of the airport eight years   which they would have otherwise ignored or excused had our
        after the administration of the airport was handed over by   attitude been positive towards them.
        Sudan to the current administrators? If so, such attempts can   Take, for example, the stupid and dangerous practice by our
        be seen as a waste of time by a poor nation trying to conceal   traffic police who demand that drivers should put on hazard
        her ugly private parts. The behaviour of our security agents   lights to indicate their intention to go straight at roundabouts!
        or  their  proxies  is  ready-made  ammunition  for  negative   Whoever  told  them  hazard  lights  should  be  used  for  such
        publicity of the young country. And it does not help when   intentions? From whose book are they reading such dangerous
        our leaders insist on challenging international media on very   traffic  rules?  In  a  country  where  people  drive  on  the  right
        thin grounds.
                                                               sight  of  the  road,  motorist  approaching  the  roundabout
        But, why should we assume the worst from photographers or   from the right of the hazard lights would only see the right
        reporters or of ourselves? Could it not be that such visitors or   side indicator and would assume that such a vehicle would
        reporters could be nicely surprised to see the improvement in   immediately turn right before entering the roundabout – and
        the parking space for aircraft at Juba Airport? Could they not   BANG! An accident!
        be impressed by the fact that high flyers like Kenya Airways,   Because  of  our  now  well-established  paranoia  against  the
        the  Ethiopian  and  Egyptian  airlines  now  frequent  Juba   camera and reporters; the difficulty of identifying the legitimate
        Airport? What about the new and up-coming terminal at the   policing  authority  from  criminals  in  uniform;  institutional
        left side of the shameful old terminal, which is still in use?   corruption from which misguided vigilantes are trying very
        Although it has been moving at a snail’s pace, the building   hard  to  silence  critics;  kidnapping,  intimidation,  torture
        has at last got a roof on all its walls and could be operational   and  even  killing  of  opinion  writers,  have  now  established
        soon; could that not be a point of reference for good publicity   South Sudan as a nation ripe for international ridicule and
        if handled correctly?
                                                               bad publicity. President Kiir has recently shaken up the top
        Okay,  suppose  such  visitors  or  reporters  get  wise  and  take   leadership of the police by retiring them; a positive move. But
        up the advice to pay the exorbitant fee which the Ministry   will the soldier, now at the helm of our police force, make a
        of Information ask for a photography or filming permit in   noticeable difference? Let’s hope so.
        the streets of Juba, would that spare them from harassment?
        Not at all. A camerawoman for Al Jazeera TV found this out   Editor’s Note
        the hard way, when her expensive camera was impounded by   Gurtong Focus welcomes brief letters from our readers regarding this issue.
        people who identified themselves as “security”. They claimed   The letters addressed to: [email protected] should be brief  and to the
                                                               point.



                                                                       Gurtong Focus Monthly  February 2013| 5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10